Why does socialism tend to result in violence and terror? The problem is that
absolute democracy creates an absolute executive power, leaving nothing to
defend the independence of people. The complex issues that people disagree
on can be infuriating, and unlike a system that supports independence, absolute
democracy will go ahead and infuriate a lot of people. The only way to ensure a
political governance is by force, but when people are infuriated, and people start
pointing guns, people get shot. Throughout history the ideal of direct democracy
has fooled people, because it doesn't appreciate the whole picture. People have
a tendency to want things in accordance to their own ideas, and democracy
becomes a hegemonic ploy that devours individuality.
Alternatively, the problem with absolute liberty is that it's physically unsustainable
in a finite world, such as limited resources, and regarding the interaction of
people, this enclosure is inescapable. Given a state of natural freedom, the
analogue structure of power in our society will eventually create a monopoly
which devours everything else; a predilection that can never surrender, burning
up any survival prospects.
It's not a matter of wanting control, it's a matter of needing something to navigate
the wrath of causality, which pure freedom and pure democracy are both blind to.
The balance between them however can create something very special;
perceptibility, such as Ying and Yang. The relationship between independence and
democracy must create that circulatory response. A kind
of mixed economy would be a solution, effectively putting a lid on inordinate
exploitation, for truth driven sustainability.
In general the essence of democracy only gives society its most popular desires,
creating a kind of group animal led by reactionary impulse, with no capacity
to overpower its contiguous perception with transcended reason. We need a
method for establishing the truth, and also a method for responding to it. Equal
rights, education and public discourse is how we discover the inevitability of truth,
but there has to be a democratic leadership with a sense of obligation, a
transparency that can't hide from the scientific method created by independence.
. . .
Good that we have created games to keep our fight challenged, without having to harm ourselves, for what
would we be able to become without fight?
Rats deprived of physical and social play become less intelligent at problem solving; compare this with our
society that causes us to avoid and alienate each other, living in boxes and brainwashed into a slave
machine that supports the absurdly indulgent of power through an invention of money, information and law.
Good and evil don't actually exist, only consciousness in a transition of birth from the animal ego, with
Such an honorable daydream of humanity is used to distract us from an overpopulation that flows with an
addiction to comfort, taken advantage by disqualifying a circulatory wisdom.
Free education is not only about the opportunity for people to earn their power through understanding, but
so truth can be uncensored, that reality can prevail.
Only shedding light can ever solve a problem, as truth inverses evil.
They think sacrifice gives power, that to be rich you must have the poor, but it's a tyrannical fantasy to
justify slavery, an apotheosis of ego, the vindictive monster of vanity.
Inventions of terrorism and the illusion that strangers want to hurt you is keeping this machine well oiled;
we are gears, turning against each other, as our hope is being worn like a mask.
What army could possibly be stronger than an intelligent, healthy and loving people?
Art is better when it's not trying to be something because then it can make the best of itself.
. . .
If art is how much love you put into something, it's a power that can be used for good or evil.
So love can be evil. But language is not an exact science. It's poetry.
The Grueling Volition
Better to be feared than loved . . . Nonsense. The idea that love can lose its appreciation, like happiness
having no context without sadness, is forgetting that reality is astronomical, unlike absolutes. A
foundation based on love is not without the pain of existence.
Fear is dealing directly with appreciation by imposing it, but an undesired relationship is less worthwhile.
Art is how much love you put into something, and that is what fear is lacking. Such is effort with great
reward; love is more difficult than fear. Such is the involuntariness of evil, the easy way out. Without
this ability to think beyond ourselves we are effortless, blind, and slave to a weakness. It takes more
effort to accomplish that which is good because the universe is objective.
Unconditional love is an understanding of the universe without reason to be jealous.
Deception is the cancer of reality.
What is progress exactly when a mild community has everything? We don't need to create more jobs for the
sake of creating jobs. We need less damage. There's nothing wrong with slowing down, especially since we
are stuck on overdrive in a mode that is producing corrupted garbage. Overfilled by this, we have no
capacity to comprehend all we have lost. Magic, a profound understanding, so much of the universe is gone
from our experience. We have been programmed by the products of our own artificial mindlessness.
Survival of the fittest no longer applies to being human. Money has changed the game, and the idea of money
being energy is horrifying. It's energy that we invented. It's artificial, worse than GMO McDonalds.
People who don't deserve it are allowed to have power over other people. It's the entire reason our most
egotistical tendencies have completely dominated all of humanity.
You need money to make money, disregarding reality. Not even the strongest or the most intelligent survive,
but a weakness of willpower putting horde over everything without restraint, seeking to control the world as
only that psychology would see fit, seeking to make an opportunity impossible for anything else.
The natural world is based on independent things which find coexistence, but capitalism inescapably amounts
to a homogeneous monopoly. There is nothing efficient about this, mass distribution for example, and
despite what our bigoted ego would have, genuine variety is the most tactical advantage. There must be some
kind of trickle-up theory to make the best of people, contributable to the greater good.
The greatest treasure is other people. And so is our life based on life.
Considering population control is hard, but allowing it to climax would become even worse. Not just the
increasing strain but for various, random death. Nobody can judge these things we don't know, such as the
experiment invested into every person. If for no moral reason, promoting death is an inefficient waste of
experience, and limiting birth has more genetic advantages, just think about it. This could also be
motivating if people had to apply for children beyond a few. Allowing overpopulation to ravage and burn
itself up is only solving this problem the easiest way, such as not making the effort.
There's another aspect of strong versus weak, that we have the willpower to do the right thing despite our
animal desire, such as fighting addiction, to put mind over matter. We have taken over the world, taken
over ourselves, and taken it too far, but we have the opportunity to be conscious, challenged now to put
truth and logic before the automatic process that keeps us impounded, while doom is creeping up all around.
Everyone says the world will recover, but that's no guarantee we will. Anyone satisfied with destroying a
future of people is purely selfish. It's a crime against humanity that our fate would be in their hands.
Letting whatever may happen actually happen is avoiding the effort, taking the easy way out. To do greater
than evil is the challenge of existence. We have the chance to become amazing creatures at this time, to
make this effort, and our most profound waste of the universe would be failing to embrace it.
. . .
Misadventures of Political Espionage
To anyone who's attempting to undermine this progressive movement of conscious evolution, ask yourself: why
defend a system which is single-handedly destroying free speech and variety with a monopoly so narrow minded
it has methodically limited our capacity to solve and treat actual problems?
Maybe it has always worked for you, to drive a powerful, effortless car, all this food and water at your
fingertips, while enjoying the comfort of a home and life of dazzling entertainment. You have immediate
access to an obscene excess without real effort.
You're thoroughly bribed, defending an addiction, a psychotic, comfort addicted, power hungry, utterly
irresponsible way of life which is engendering an evolutionary disaster, and you have got to appreciate
that. No excuses. The real world is something better than you can imagine. Don't be afraid of allowing
it to happen.
Consider also that nature doesn't face you; it doesn't glorify your existence in any way. Yet we have created
a society full of signs and slogans, constantly pointing at us with recognition. This and desire at every
turn, our sense of self and ego is constantly being stimulated, all the time, all for you, yes you.
Commercialism is doing great damage, and our breakdown of community is lending to greed as well by rendering
people into more of a survival mode. Greed comes from the self-preservation inside us, that core programming.
It's stimulated, and if we forget what we're made of it will undoubtedly come sneaking up to surprise us.
. . .
An Invincible Manipulation
People with power use superiority to create the impression of it. We're surrounded by this bully complex
because it was a strategy for self-preservation in nature. But we're at this point when it has become
systemically detrimental. The animal ego is not conductive to critical thinking. We need to evolve
something else, something greater that transcends the insanity of its obsolescence. We are challenged now
to put mind over matter, to actually think with our minds, and not with our cockadoodle.
Landlords are bullies, buying up everything, endeavoring to own people. Why is it legal to own a place that
somebody else lives in, just for the sake of robbing them? Making money from money is bad enough without
having it create slavery.
Nurse Ratched is a bully, being cool while pushing your buttons. Manipulative power is the worst kind
because it's stealthy, remaining unidentifiable to become invincible. Such is the nature of espionage,
pulling the strings of a puppet show.
There is a standard strategy by those in power to psychologically discredit something by ignoring it. But
how has it been managed that all of society is brainwashed into such a reflexive disbelief of conspiracy?
Just think about it. It's pretty weird, because conspiracy is exactly one of the biggest problems we now
face. It's not just big money taking over accidently, people are behind it.
Hollywood, the media, and slowly but surely the internet, there is great effort being put into monopolizing
free speech. And who's actually in charge, having grown into hundreds of departments and agencies operating
over a thousand facilities all over the country. Almost 1 million people now have "top secret" clearance
for undisclosed reasons, and there's an unaccountable leech on the treasury that no leaders have the guts to
Whatever the whole truth is, the point is that these forces with leverage all over our system will not
willingly ever give up their power, and we're not going to deviate from their agenda by playing a system
which they are subversively inventing. They will stretch this out, leading us on, all the while our planet
and evolution suffering from this incompetent selfishness.
They don't want independent communities and free education; they want capitalism and mass distribution. They
don't want people to earn their power through understanding; they want to control the information and
indoctrinate us into their view of reality, conditioning people into a slave machine that supports their
own, greed driven authority.
This is what Kennedy tried to say, that free speech is our only weapon against this kind of enemy. But we
have to fight. Their determination to confuse us, strip rights and censor communication is an attempt to
dilute our advantage. They need to prevent people from uniting against their blatant creation of dependency
and domination of our government. We need a unity that the mass can focus upon, and also so that our effort
can consolidate, like a laser to perform surgery, to have that strength, the power of the people.
But seriously, what can we do? People have a house to take care of, or a job to keep, even kids to raise.
The mass of people is an avalanche, a tremendous momentum pouring through the cracks of our environment.
Is somebody supposed to just up and defy what's comfortable when nobody else is? That's madness.
People need an option, something to participate with. There's plenty of outrage but effectively zero
opportunity. That power of people is organization, a flagship, something consistent the mass of people
can convey and keep track of. That's how you fight the information war and reach people, with the marketing
strategies of identity. Occupy was almost that thing, and maybe it still can be. Knowing what really needs to
change it shouldn't be able to avoid that mission, no matter what espionage.
Otherwise what, we're the intellectual barbarians of a torpid armageddon, as it becomes so bad everyone will
be fighting them anyway in desperation, hopefully to install the right ideas in that rubble, once again for space
and time to judge. They've dominated because it's in our animal to be egotistical, and they're not going to give up.
Nothing makes sense, except everything. Gandhi said an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind
because people teach each other to use violence to solve problems. Peace will defeat violence because
learning has value and war is a childish tantrum. The ultimate leader shouldn't be a person. It should be a
foundation of united rights, based on the combination of education and free speech, for without that
democracy is nothing but justification.
Sometimes we need leaders to have vision, who can cherish and enhance the participation of others, to organize
and make sure things happen; or even make the hard decisions that go against our comfort zones. And sometimes
that leader is evil, and it's up to their boss, democracy, education and free speech.
. . .
Startup Program for Communities
Mass distribution is bad, and not just because it's a horrendous
waste of energy and resources, and not just because it perverts
the quality and anatomy of our food. But because it's a tool
for a monopoly to become the sole provider, and private
ownership that forcibly affects everyone is a recipe for autocracy.
The same monopoly has happened to our media and entertainment, and
together with all things we are being automatized and contained
by a singular world view. Crappy music with repetitive hooks will
dominate our experience.
We're in this together, our turn to face the weather, the universe.
Global calamity is already approaching as a result of pollution. We don't even know what's too late.
That's more than enough reason to demand some change right now. The scariest thing is that most people, the
mass of people, brainwashed with consumerism and addicted to comfort, don't care about the world. It's too
big, and being alive is complicated enough without having to comprehend such a threat. The system around
us needs to change, but we cannot just change things because such interconnectedness has been established,
groomed carefully into a dependency.
This is something with positive, multifaceted impact and feasibility, to wean ourselves and relieve mass
distribution, and this can be done with independent communities. Consider that 10 pounds of fuel is attached to
every pound of food 4 billion people eat. Consider also how much fuel this living where you work model would save
us. The common philosophy with communities is 20-30 hour work weeks, which is less stress and also more jobs.
We absolutely must take care of our food, more than anything. Communities such as this could be self-providing
as well as distributing to the surrounding vicinity. It would save a huge amount of fuel, cause that much less
pollution, and reduce the need for preservatives or GMO. Also, we're naturally social creatures. This kind
of interaction and free education is vital and creates more developed skill with open-minded critical
thinking and problem solving.
There is plenty of space that can be transformed into things like this, but to overhaul our system at large,
establishing independent communities would really need something to help this become prolific.
Such as a government program that could fund the beginning stages, but that is extremely dependent on change,
especially with the control big money has. Otherwise anything in this direction is going to be slow, difficult, and
viciously opposed by those who profit from mass distribution.
For that matter, capitalism is doing so much damage because anything is up for grabs, such as food, water, energy,
etc. We need public ownership of vital resources and necessities, limited and regulated by a truly democratic
government. This planet and its problems belong to everyone.
The definite thing about change is that it requires change. Independence of community is key to making a functional
system that can promote education and free speech. This can make food healthy, significantly cut pollution, and
nurture society. If it doesn't make possible a world without the perverted energy of money, it can help in starting
to create one similar.
Life needs to be based on life, for insanity is the true believing of things that are not real, and how that will
conflict with reality.